March 12, 2025

I’m back with my annual review of Lightroom VS Capture One pro in 2025, and we have a lot to compare this year. In fact, I skipped last year waiting for features to iron out and boy, did they.

C1 VS LR. They are King and Queen of editors. But who is King?

When using presets I used as many free pack as I could like the Silver 5 and FIlmist 2 samplers. For speed masks I used Elegance 4.

In the video we test new features, noise and look at the whole picture. But in the end this is not like my DXO Photo Lab review or my Luminar Neo review where both fell short on basic pro features.

My review is finally here and in putting LR and C1 head to head what we see is competition is fierce this year and other apps like DXO, Luminar and OnOne need to step up.

In the war of RAW editors, both Lightroom and Capture One are top notch in their process and feature,s and you can feel good going with either if one makes you feel more creative or productive than the other.

No, nothing this year is a game changer. But there are improvements coming from both lightroom and Capture one. More subtle in Lightroom and in Capture One, things like Match look and Ai crop.

The most game-changing thing in Capture One is actually what they are not focusing on that much and that’s that they have finally almost caught up in masking tools and layers and I’ll show you that in the video.

I do say almost, because there is still no sky mask and this is actually a big lack. I didn’t get into it the video, but I’m hoping Capture one will add this soon.

Capture One Studio has also been added with a few extra features that are mostly collaborative, a few extra Ai tools etc. And it costs nearly twice as much. Making C1 alone nearly as spendy as the entire Adobe Creative Suite. Most won’t need this and it’s a bad look for C1 as these features should be in the pro version. They already cost more than Lightroom.

What about Lightroom instead of Lightroom Classic. The develop and base features are the same and with Lightroom you get both and the mobile app for one price. You can can switch around as needed, but in general I use Lightroom Classic and it has more features. I do compare that in this video.

There is also an App for Capture One but it’s still IOS only. I have not done a review of it, but compared to the Lightroom Mobile app which actually doe nearly everything and can even simply sync with a collection on from LR Classic, the Capture One mobile app is pretty limited.

In the video I’ll give my opening and final conclusion for the best photo RAW app of 2025 and whether you should use Lightroom or Capture One. Either way you’ll still need a pixel level editing app like Photoshop, even if you use an older version like CS6. I’ve touched on this in the video.

What I am confident in saying is that both meet my own high standards and can create world class images. But in short, Lightroom Wins again overall.

But that does not mean it wins for you.

Watch the video, leave your thoughts in the comments and please share – Gavin Seim

Read More

February 22, 2025

In my recent Filmist 2.4 update I improved various Lightroom presets and Capture One styles. But one of the biggest was the Velvia 100. Here’s what I found and what we can learn from Velvia 100.

The other films in my latest Filmist Update may have been overshadowed a bit by the new Kodachrome 64 update and the video I did on it that you can watch here.

If you missed last week’s in-depth video on Kodachrome 64 go check it out.

But I want to do a follow-up because I did a lot of Velvia testing and thought we should compare these Kodak and Fuji positive films. Because Velvia is the contrast beast.

If film presets that are true to the film have a subtlety that can help us understand tone and color. Kodachrome 64 and Velvia are both color-positive films but each is unique. And while you can’t get Kodachrome anymore you can still get Velvia 100, in fact, I just shot a roll!

There had to be a lot of work on the red mix curve and midtones here. But they should not be as red as people imagine them. When you see really red in fil;m. It’s often because it was processed wrong.

In the same way in digital; when a process feels a little too magenta or yellow. Often a simple White Balance hack with fill it. See my recent video about color science.

Velvia 50 is more red, but in Velvia 100 there’s more yellow and green. People also think Velvia is extra saturated. But in truth, it’s not that crazy. It does have a lot of contrast, however.

Real contrast is the most important thing we can learn from Velvia. That it’s not always about pushing shadows and having “dynamic range”. This film blows out easily and while it’s not ideal, it makes you think a lot about tonality. This contrast idea is talked about in my video, Stop Using Contrast.

Velvia is the opposite of edits like I made in Natural HDR or even negative films. Notice how it’s more contrasty with popping blacks and whites. This is true to the filmstrips I got back from the lab. That does not mean it’s not stunning for portraits or anything else.

Look at how the Velvia 100 preset stacks up against the Portra 400 preset. This file was shot on Micro Four Thirds and both of these presets are solid to the look of their respective films.

Next to Portra 400 Velvia feels a bit Red. But it’s mostly because they are side by. Portra is warm,. Velvia is contrasty and punchy. Velvia 100 is pretty versatile but not so versatile Portra 400. No surprise.

You don’t always want HDR or even film negative level dynamic range. They can be amawszing but in essence, are lower contrast.

In Filmist we can of course increase the dynamic range by adding ChemKit mods or pushing slider. But remember low dynamic range means punchy contrast and often it’s amazing.

Velvia is famous for its rich colors and while it may seem subdued by today’s oversaturated digital norms, it’s more versatile than people think.

If you’ve ever used most so-called Velvia presets they have way overdone color on digital because most film presets are not at all like the film. There just is the name and go all kinds of crazy things.

If you look at the actual strips and scans you see this contrast. You also see this reddish undertone but the greens and yellow from the film curve stand out more. It’s the way this combines that makes the film so punchy.

I use Fuji cameras also, though I don’t worry about color profiles and just add the presets after. In fact my Classic Neg preset which is free in the Filmist sampler pack is very popular because many want that Classic Neg look on non-Fuji files.

But sometimes people use Velvia on their Fuji camera and then my Velvia preset and they are nothing alike. I noticed this in the excellent review of Filmist and NHDR5 from Matt at the Turning Gate.

The truth is the Fuji Velvia profile is nothing like Velvia. They just made a highly saturated profile that name that is more loosey inspired by how people feel about Velvia. There’s nothing wrong with that profile (though I rarely want that much saturation) but understand that it has no relation to the film as we see here.

Whatever i am editing. I’ll start with a film look. Even if I end up on Natural HDR, Silver 5 etc. This is because the real color of films is a baseline you can always come back to and each time you get more confident in your process because you have that baseline.

I immediately know what’s up with a file when lets say I use Portra, Ahfa or Velvia or Kodachrome. These are iconic standards and in using them I can quickly see the way colors and light are responding and guide where I need to go from there.

You can see in my recent photo on Velvia below that the preset was applied to a Fuji RAW file. There are differences, especially in the film’s shadow range. I maintained that punch but you still still see that Velvia film falls off faster on 35mm.

Editing with film real film looks makes all my other editing better and more grounded. It helps prevent me from over editing and it lets me find more creative ideas faster.

I hope you’ll play around with the new pack and even if you don’t have Filmist 2 you can grab the free sampler and get started with film-grade edits. You can get the Velvia 100 in Filmist 2,4 right here.

The takeaway here is that we can use tone and contrast naturally in camera and in post. Like we talk about in my Shadow Hackers class. Today we push a slider for contrast. But when you start being guided by the organic nature of things, you start to see your contrast in a new light.

Have fun and try this yourself – Gavin Seim

Read More

January 18, 2025

The main goal of camera makers is to lock you in maker is to sell new products. That’s why every year they pretend they have revolutionized everything.

You can try some of the film presets I was using including Classic negative here in the free film sampler pack. Also watch my video on white balance and the Drop Color method.

It’s not that we should be lazy about color. But notice in the video how the differences are not always that huge,. The more you stop stressing about color and use the tools, presets, filters and setting to get the look YOU want, the easier color becomes.

The science of color is real. The color science we’re being sol is a marketing lie.

In the end you can apply any look you want and then adjust the Color-Science of it a bit with a very small adjustment. So Sure I might use Classic Negative or Portra. they are great. But I’ll do it as a preset or profile after on the RAW. Usually as a preset because I can us that on any camera.

I know pros always say this and while the things I show here can be done on JPEGS, shooting RAw will always get you better color control. JPEG bakes in a camera profile and not always the best one for your scene. So then you edit again and it’s like baking a cake twice.

In camera profiles are fun. But in the end they are simply a preset that you have a lot less control over and pay over and pay a lot more for than the packs I make here on Seim Effects.

Taking time to dial in perfect color and save it is great. But Don’t get stuck on one look.

That newest camera wont make your color better.

And there’s no one right color for sunsets, skin or landscapes.

Tale Canon who gets you ins their system then over charges for lens and prevents third part lenses from being sold. It’s a bait and switch. But you don’t need to be loyal to a camera brand. They all do the same thing.

Did you notice how much color changes in my video, with even small directional changes. That’s why you don’t want to be locked in. Any camera can be good on any of the situations. You just nee to know how to nudge your color like I showed you here.

If you want more videos on this topic let me know – Gavin Seim

Read More

December 24, 2024

Mod presets are in all my packs and Mod-Kit is included in many like Silver, PowerFlow, and the new Natural HDR 5. Using a common mod pack saves time and this video shows you how.

The concept is simple. You can use the mods included in my presets or make your own. I’ll show you in today’s video not only how to use Mod-Kit 2 but also how to make mods.

You’ll find packs like Filmist with ChemKit mods and other packs like Silver 5 that have basic mods and also include a mods kit. You can download sampler packs of them for free.

With this method with presets, you usually can have any image dialed in in a few seconds. Then when I’m in workflow mode I’ll just copy those settings to all similar images from that set and move on to the next.

These are still mod presets but they only affect masking and I do this the same way in Lightroom and now Capture One Spee mask styles.

In my mod packs, there are always basic Ai mask presets like for a portrait lets say. But I also have a complete pack of these called Elegance Speed Masks. Skies, people, things. All in automated mod masks.

As I mentioned in the video I’ll usually use Ai masking mod presets after I’ve done everything else and paste those settings to similar groups if images. This is because Ai masks can really slow things down.

Choosing and stacking mods…

Years ago I started doing mods because people always wanted to stack presets. But this is not Photoshop and when you add a global preset it overrides the settings of the previous one.

Mods solve this. You simply start with a global master preset to get your loo. Then stack as many mods as you want on top of that.

Don’t overthink this. You want a darker, more contrast, softer glow. There’s a mod for that in Mod-Kit 2 and you can mix those with the pack-specific mods or those you create yourself.

There are no real rules when you use Mod-Kit or any other mod presets. If it’s a mod preset it only affects a few settings and you can mix and match on top of your main recipe.

Go have some fun… Gavin Seim

Read More

December 4, 2024

Film and darkroom processes do make you think more about your photographer. But are they the right tools for improving especially for beginners? Probably not! But there’s a viable alternative.

You can also get the free Filmist presets here to see real film tones in your edits. Also actions like Emulsion were created based on darkroom processes.

Film has made a big comeback in the past few years as people tire of fakery and Ai and want more organic real experiences. But it’s also very expensive.

Whether it’s the magic of Instax or POloroids or whether it’s the subtle shadow and color theories you understand better using film. It does pay off. I just don’t think it’s the secret sauce for newer photography for the reasons I mention in the video.

Someone recently told me they liked my LIghtroom presets because they were not gaudy and pointless. A lot of that is that I’ve been making pro-grade presets longer than anyone on the market. But what I immediately thought of is film.

My film and shadow hacking studies have shaped the way I create tools and it’s a big reason why they are different from the others on the market. The way film helps you understand subtlety and tone and color versus just pushing a slider increases the more you use it. If you spend any time on analog I think you’ll understand what I mean.

If I plied film is not worth it that’s not what I mean. What I mean is that film is a tough tool to start on. It’s more something to work with once you are at that intermediate or advanced level where it’s nuance will mean more to you.

So yes, everyone. Get some vintage lenses. Shoot some film on the cameras that often come with them. But don’t think you need film to improve your photography. Slow down and let the shadow lead you.

Gavin Seim

Read More